form-1040-review
Review U.S. individual income tax returns (Form 1040/1040-SR) for the most recent tax year, compare major return items against current-year tax rules, check consistency across historical returns when multiple years are provided, generate a standalone DOCX risk register, and estimate audit likelihood from return content. Use when tasks involve 1040 compliance review, multi-year consistency analysis, tax-law validation, or audit-risk assessment.
Install via CLI (Recommended)
clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/chipmunkrpa/usa-tax-return-review-1040Form 1040 Review
Overview
Run a structured review of normalized Form 1040 data for the latest tax year in the provided set. Produce three artifacts: a detailed findings JSON file, a markdown summary, and a separate DOCX risk report listing major items and related risks.
Quick Start
- Prepare normalized input JSON using references/input_schema.json.
- Confirm current-law parameters in references/current_tax_law_2025.json before use.
- Run:
python scripts/review_1040.py --input <normalized_returns.json> --output-dir output/form-1040-review
- Review outputs:
review_summary.mdreview_findings.jsonform-1040-risk-report.docx
Workflow
1. Identify the current return
- Select the highest
tax_yearin the input as the current return. - Treat all prior years as historical comparison returns.
2. Run current-year law checks
- Validate internal arithmetic and line-to-line relationships.
- Compare major current-year items to law parameters:
- Standard deduction by filing status and age/blind additions.
- Regular-rate tax computation when no preferential income is present.
- Child Tax Credit and ACTC limits.
- Self-employment tax and Additional Medicare tax thresholds.
3. Run multi-year consistency checks
- Compare current return against the most recent prior year.
- Flag large year-over-year movement in wages, AGI, taxable income, credits, payments, and refund/amount owed.
- Flag filing-status and dependent-count shifts for explanation.
4. Produce risk outputs
- Generate a structured findings file (
review_findings.json). - Generate a human-readable summary (
review_summary.md). - Generate a standalone DOCX risk register (
form-1040-risk-report.docx) that lists each major item, severity, observations, and recommended documentation. - Produce an audit-likelihood estimate based on weighted findings and return complexity.
Inputs
Use the normalized schema in references/input_schema.json. At minimum, include:
tax_yearfiling_statusmajor_itemsfor core 1040 lines (AGI, deduction, taxable income, tax, payments, refund/amount owed)
Use references/major_items_reference.md for canonical key mapping.
Law Source Discipline
- Update references/current_tax_law_2025.json when the filing year changes or IRS issues revisions.
- Use only official IRS/SSA sources for numeric thresholds.
- If law data is older than the analyzed return year, flag the result as stale and require manual update before final sign-off.
Script
scripts/review_1040.py performs:
- Current-year arithmetic and law checks.
- Prior-year consistency checks.
- Weighted audit-risk scoring.
- DOCX risk report generation with
python-docx.
If python-docx is missing, install it:
python -m pip install --user python-docx
Metadata
Not sure this is the right skill?
Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.
Find the right skillPaste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.
{
"plugins": {
"official-chipmunkrpa-usa-tax-return-review-1040": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_update": true
}
}
}Related Skills
redline
Review and redline DOCX contracts paragraph by paragraph with tracked changes, clause-level risk analysis, and draft comment responses. Use when a user wants contract revisions that are specific to each paragraph or bullet, especially for privacy, security, data-processing, liability, AI, or other negotiated legal terms.
accounting-finance-system-research
Research and solve "how do I do this?" questions inside accounting and finance software systems (ERP, GL, AP/AR, billing, close, and reporting tools). Use when a user needs operational steps, setup guidance, or troubleshooting help in a specific system and wants the result documented as a quick memo or simple Q-and-A DOCX.
finresearchclaw
Finance, accounting, and investment research automation via the FinResearchClaw repo. Use when asked to run autonomous finance research workflows such as event studies, factor-model research, accounting regressions, forecast-error analysis, valuation research, or investment research pipelines. Prefer execution in this order: (1) Codex/ACP Codex when available, (2) Claude Code/ACP Claude, (3) direct API/config mode only as a fallback.
brd-reviewer
Review Business Requirements Documents in `.docx` format by reading the existing BRD, extracting paragraph-level context, drafting clarification questions for unclear statements, and producing a final Word document that combines comments and tracked changes. Use when the user wants a BRD reviewed, challenged for ambiguity, or redlined with proposed wording improvements while preserving Word-native review features.
relativity-deposition-question-builder
Develop deposition question sets from Relativity-exported PDF productions using a user-provided legal theory. Use when tasks involve reviewing opponent-produced PDFs, extracting per-page document IDs from the bottom-right corner (if two numbers appear, use the smaller one), mapping document relevance to a legal theory, and drafting questions grouped by document ID with required rationale and supporting quotes.