accounting-finance-system-research
Research and solve "how do I do this?" questions inside accounting and finance software systems (ERP, GL, AP/AR, billing, close, and reporting tools). Use when a user needs operational steps, setup guidance, or troubleshooting help in a specific system and wants the result documented as a quick memo or simple Q-and-A DOCX.
Install via CLI (Recommended)
clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/chipmunkrpa/accounting-finance-system-skillAccounting And Finance System Research
Overview
Follow a fixed process for system-how-to support: collect facts, ask clarifying questions, confirm output format, confirm understanding, research external guidance, analyze the best path, and generate a DOCX deliverable.
Required Behavior
- Ask clarifying questions before proposing a solution.
- Confirm whether output should be
quick memoorsimple q-and-a. - Restate understanding and wait for confirmation before web research.
- Research the internet after confirmation, prioritizing official vendor guidance.
- Separate source-backed guidance from assumptions or inference.
- Include source links and accessed dates in the deliverable.
- Generate a DOCX report in the user-selected format.
Workflow
1) Intake And Scope
- Capture the user objective in one sentence.
- Confirm system name and version/edition (for example: NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA Cloud, Dynamics 365 Finance, QuickBooks).
- Confirm module or workflow area (for example: AP, AR, close, reconciliations, reporting).
- Confirm role/permission constraints and any deadline pressure.
2) Clarification Questions (Mandatory)
- Use references/clarification-question-bank.md.
- Ask only missing critical questions; avoid redundant prompts.
- Pause solutioning until enough facts are available.
- If facts remain unknown, continue with explicit assumptions and conditional guidance.
3) Output Format Confirmation (Mandatory)
- Ask the user to choose one:
quick memo: concise professional summary with recommendation and steps.simple q-and-a: direct answer format with numbered actions.- Default to
quick memoonly when user gives no preference.
4) Understanding Confirmation (Mandatory)
- Restate:
- problem statement
- system context
- open questions or assumptions
- chosen output format
- Ask for explicit confirmation before researching.
5) Research External Guidance
- Follow source ranking in references/source-priority.md.
- Gather at least two relevant sources where possible.
- Include at least one official vendor source when available.
- Track per-source metadata: title, publisher, URL, updated/published date if available, accessed date.
- Prefer current version-specific guidance over older generic content.
6) Analyze And Build Recommendations
- Translate research into concrete user actions.
- Provide prerequisites and permissions needed for each action.
- Add fallback steps when primary path is blocked.
- Include validation checks to confirm completion.
- Call out risks and unresolved dependencies.
7) Generate DOCX Deliverable
- Build JSON input using references/report-json-schema.md.
- Run:
python scripts/build_system_guidance_docx.py \
--input-json <analysis.json> \
--output-docx <system-guidance.docx> \
--format <memo|q-and-a>
Metadata
Not sure this is the right skill?
Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.
Find the right skillPaste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.
{
"plugins": {
"official-chipmunkrpa-accounting-finance-system-skill": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_update": true
}
}
}Related Skills
redline
Review and redline DOCX contracts paragraph by paragraph with tracked changes, clause-level risk analysis, and draft comment responses. Use when a user wants contract revisions that are specific to each paragraph or bullet, especially for privacy, security, data-processing, liability, AI, or other negotiated legal terms.
finresearchclaw
Finance, accounting, and investment research automation via the FinResearchClaw repo. Use when asked to run autonomous finance research workflows such as event studies, factor-model research, accounting regressions, forecast-error analysis, valuation research, or investment research pipelines. Prefer execution in this order: (1) Codex/ACP Codex when available, (2) Claude Code/ACP Claude, (3) direct API/config mode only as a fallback.
brd-reviewer
Review Business Requirements Documents in `.docx` format by reading the existing BRD, extracting paragraph-level context, drafting clarification questions for unclear statements, and producing a final Word document that combines comments and tracked changes. Use when the user wants a BRD reviewed, challenged for ambiguity, or redlined with proposed wording improvements while preserving Word-native review features.
relativity-deposition-question-builder
Develop deposition question sets from Relativity-exported PDF productions using a user-provided legal theory. Use when tasks involve reviewing opponent-produced PDFs, extracting per-page document IDs from the bottom-right corner (if two numbers appear, use the smaller one), mapping document relevance to a legal theory, and drafting questions grouped by document ID with required rationale and supporting quotes.
form-1040-review
Review U.S. individual income tax returns (Form 1040/1040-SR) for the most recent tax year, compare major return items against current-year tax rules, check consistency across historical returns when multiple years are provided, generate a standalone DOCX risk register, and estimate audit likelihood from return content. Use when tasks involve 1040 compliance review, multi-year consistency analysis, tax-law validation, or audit-risk assessment.