deep-research
Autonomous multi-model deep research with framework-driven reasoning. Spawns 4 parallel model agents (Gemini 2.5 Pro, o3, Opus, MiniMax), each applies best-practice frameworks to the question, then merges into a cross-validated final report. Use when: (1) user asks for in-depth research, (2) 'research X' or 'deep dive on X', (3) complex questions requiring multiple sources. NOT for: simple factual lookups.
Install via CLI (Recommended)
clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/leadingot/opusflame-deep-researchDeep Research (Multi-Model + Framework-Driven)
Autonomous research system that runs 4 AI models in parallel, each applying relevant analytical frameworks, then cross-validates and merges findings into a comprehensive cited report.
Architecture
User Question
│
▼
┌─ Phase 0: Framework Selection ─┐
│ Identify best-practice │
│ framework(s) for this question │
└────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
┌───────┼───────┐───────┐
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
Gemini o3 Opus MiniMax
2.5 Pro 4 M2.5
(search (deep (nuance (China/
heavy) logic) +balance)alt view)
│ │ │ │
└───────┼───────┘───────┘
▼
Phase 5: Merge & Cross-Validate
│
▼
Final Report (PDF)
Phase 0: Framework Selection (MANDATORY — before any research)
Before researching, ask: "Is there a best-practice framework for answering this type of question?"
Framework Lookup Table
| Question Type | Frameworks to Apply |
|---|---|
| Competitive strategy | Porter's Five Forces, 7 Powers (Helmer), Schwerpunkt/High Ground (Packy), SWOT |
| Market entry / sizing | TAM/SAM/SOM, Blue Ocean Strategy, Jobs-to-be-Done |
| Business model evaluation | Business Model Canvas, Unit Economics, Ramp vs Route test (point solution vs platform?) |
| Investment / valuation | DCF, Comparable Analysis, Venture method, Power Law thesis |
| Product strategy | JTBD, Kano Model, Value Prop Canvas, Hook Model |
| Growth / GTM | AARRR Pirate Metrics, Bullseye Framework, STP (Segmentation-Targeting-Positioning) |
| Technology assessment | Gartner Hype Cycle, Wardley Maps, Build vs Buy matrix |
| Risk analysis | Pre-Mortem, FMEA, Scenario Planning |
| Organizational / ops | OKR analysis, RACI, Theory of Constraints |
| Pricing | Van Westendorp, Conjoint, Value-based pricing framework |
| Industry analysis | Value Chain Analysis, Industry Lifecycle, Winner-Takes-More thesis |
| Person / hiring | Track Record Analysis, Reference Triangle, Founder-Market Fit |
If a framework applies:
- Include it in the prompt to each model
- Structure the model's analysis around the framework's components
- The final report should explicitly reference which framework(s) were used and why
If no standard framework applies:
- State "No standard framework identified — using first-principles analysis"
- Each model reasons from first principles with explicit assumptions stated
Phase 1: Decompose (30s)
Break the topic into 5-8 research sub-questions. Think like an investigative journalist:
- What are the key facts?
- What are different perspectives/sources?
- What's the timeline/history?
- What data/evidence exists?
- What are the unknowns or controversies?
Phase 2: Spawn 4 Model Agents (Parallel)
Spawn 4 sub-agents using sessions_spawn, each with a different model:
Metadata
Not sure this is the right skill?
Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.
Find the right skillPaste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.
{
"plugins": {
"official-leadingot-opusflame-deep-research": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_update": true
}
}
}