ClawKit Logo
ClawKitReliability Toolkit
Back to Registry
Official Verified

sql-optimization

Deep SQL performance workflow—symptom framing, execution plans, indexing strategy, query rewrite, locking/transaction behavior, statistics, partitioning, and verification. Use when queries time out, DB CPU spikes, or migrations change access patterns.

skill-install — Terminal

Install via CLI (Recommended)

clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/codekungfu/sql-optimization
Or

SQL Optimization (Deep Workflow)

Optimization without measurement is guesswork. Structure the work as observe → explain (plan) → change → verify, with explicit attention to correctness, locks, and write amplification from indexes.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • Slow queries, growing P95/P99, replication lag, lock waits
  • ORM-generated SQL surprises; N+1 at DB layer
  • Index explosion, bloat, or “we added indexes everywhere”

Initial offer:

Use six stages: (1) frame the problem, (2) reproduce & measure, (3) read execution plans, (4) schema & indexes, (5) query & transaction tuning, (6) verify & guardrail. Confirm engine (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, etc.) and environment (prod-like data volume).


Stage 1: Frame the Problem

Goal: Define SLO, scope, and non-goals.

Questions

  1. Which queries or endpoints are slow? User-facing vs batch?
  2. Regression—did deploy, data volume, or stats change?
  3. Isolation level and consistency requirements—can we read replicas?
  4. Write risk: is this table write-heavy? Index cost?

Exit condition: One-line problem statement with metric (e.g., “p95 2.4s on /reports at 10k RPS”).


Stage 2: Reproduce & Measure

Goal: Stable repro with representative cardinality and parameters.

Actions

  • Capture exact SQL, parameters, and frequency
  • Use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) or equivalent—engine-specific
  • Check buffer cache effects: cold vs warm cache; run twice when needed
  • Compare prod stats vs staging—row counts, histograms

Pitfalls

  • Optimizing on empty dev DB
  • Different parameter sniffing values changing plan choice

Exit condition: Baseline numbers + plan hash or saved plan for A/B.


Stage 3: Read Execution Plans

Goal: Name the dominant cost: seq scan, bad join order, sort, hash spill, nested loop explosion.

Interpret (adapt to engine)

  • Seq scan on large tables—filter selectivity? missing index? stats?
  • Index scan vs bitmap vs index only—covering indexes trade-offs
  • Joins: wrong order, missing stats, outdated NDV
  • Sort/hash spills to disk—work_mem / memory grants
  • Locks: FOR UPDATE, long transactions, hot row updates

Exit condition: Hypothesis tied to plan node(s), not generic “add index.”


Stage 4: Schema & Indexes

Goal: Right indexes for read paths without destroying writes.

Strategy

  • Composite index column order: equality → range; avoid redundant indexes
  • Partial indexes for hot subsets
  • Covering indexes vs table bloat—measure write cost
  • Foreign keys and constraints affecting plans
  • Statistics: ANALYZE, extended stats, histograms—when stale stats lie

Advanced (when relevant)

  • Partitioning for prune + maintenance
  • Materialized views / pre-aggregation for heavy reports

Metadata

Stars3453
Views1
Updated2026-03-26
View Author Profile
AI Skill Finder

Not sure this is the right skill?

Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.

Find the right skill
Add to Configuration

Paste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.

{
  "plugins": {
    "official-codekungfu-sql-optimization": {
      "enabled": true,
      "auto_update": true
    }
  }
}
Safety NoteClawKit audits metadata but not runtime behavior. Use with caution.