subagent-testing
Test skills via RED/GREEN/REFACTOR TDD with fresh subagents
Install via CLI (Recommended)
clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/athola/nm-abstract-subagent-testingNight Market Skill — ported from claude-night-market/abstract. For the full experience with agents, hooks, and commands, install the Claude Code plugin.
Subagent Testing - TDD for Skills
Test skills with fresh subagent instances to prevent priming bias and validate effectiveness.
Table of Contents
- Overview
- Why Fresh Instances Matter
- Testing Methodology
- Quick Start
- Detailed Testing Guide
- Success Criteria
Overview
Fresh instances prevent priming: Each test uses a new Claude conversation to verify the skill's impact is measured, not conversation history effects.
Why Fresh Instances Matter
The Priming Problem
Running tests in the same conversation creates bias:
- Prior context influences responses
- Skill effects get mixed with conversation history
- Can't isolate skill's true impact
Fresh Instance Benefits
- Isolation: Each test starts clean
- Reproducibility: Consistent baseline state
- Measurement: Clear before/after comparison
- Validation: Proves skill effectiveness, not priming
Testing Methodology
Three-phase TDD-style approach:
Phase 1: Baseline Testing (RED)
Test without skill to establish baseline behavior.
Phase 2: With-Skill Testing (GREEN)
Test with skill loaded to measure improvements.
Phase 3: Rationalization Testing (REFACTOR)
Test skill's anti-rationalization guardrails.
Quick Start
# 1. Create baseline tests (without skill)
# Use 5 diverse scenarios
# Document full responses
# 2. Create with-skill tests (fresh instances)
# Load skill explicitly
# Use identical prompts
# Compare to baseline
# 3. Create rationalization tests
# Test anti-rationalization patterns
# Verify guardrails work
Detailed Testing Guide
For complete testing patterns, examples, and templates:
- Testing Patterns - Full TDD methodology
- Test Examples - Baseline, with-skill, rationalization tests
- Analysis Templates - Scoring and comparison frameworks
Success Criteria
- Baseline: Document 5+ diverse baseline scenarios
- Improvement: ≥50% improvement in skill-related metrics
- Consistency: Results reproducible across fresh instances
- Rationalization Defense: Guardrails prevent ≥80% of rationalization attempts
See Also
- skill-authoring: Creating effective skills
- bulletproof-skill: Anti-rationalization patterns
- test-skill: Automated skill testing command
Metadata
Not sure this is the right skill?
Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.
Find the right skillPaste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.
{
"plugins": {
"official-athola-nm-abstract-subagent-testing": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_update": true
}
}
}Related Skills
extract
Analyze a codebase and build a knowledge base of business logic, architecture, data flow, and engineering patterns. The foundation for gauntlet challenges and agent integration
discourse
>- Scan community discussion channels (HN, Lobsters, Reddit, tech blogs) for experience reports and opinions on a topic
synthesize
>- Merge, deduplicate, rank, and format research findings from multiple channels into a coherent report. Use after research agents return their results
workflow-monitor
Detect workflow failures and inefficient patterns, then create GitHub issues for improvement via /fix-workflow
architecture-paradigm-hexagonal
Hexagonal (Ports and Adapters) architecture isolating domain logic from infrastructure