olo-deal-screening
Target company evaluation and deal qualification for PE and strategic buyers
Install via CLI (Recommended)
clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/aniebyl/olo-deal-screeningDeal Screening for M&A
Score and qualify acquisition targets against buyer investment criteria.
Screening Framework
Evaluate targets across five dimensions, each scored 0-100:
1. Strategic Fit (25% weight)
- Industry/sector alignment with buyer portfolio
- Geographic fit (markets, operations, customer base)
- Product/service complementarity
- Technology or capability gap fill
- Brand and market position value
2. Financial Profile (25% weight)
- Revenue scale (minimum threshold check)
- Revenue growth trajectory (3-year trend)
- EBITDA margin vs. industry benchmark
- Revenue quality (recurring vs. one-time, customer concentration)
- Working capital efficiency
3. Valuation Attractiveness (20% weight)
- EV/EBITDA vs. comparable transactions
- EV/Revenue vs. sector median
- Implied IRR at estimated purchase price
- Multiple arbitrage potential (buy low, exit higher)
4. Risk Profile (15% weight)
- Customer concentration (top 10 customers as % of revenue)
- Key-person dependency
- Regulatory exposure
- Technology obsolescence risk
- Litigation or compliance issues
5. Execution Feasibility (15% weight)
- Management team quality and retention likelihood
- Integration complexity estimate
- Competitive auction dynamics
- Seller motivation and timeline
- Financing availability
Scoring Output
Overall Fit Score: 78/100 — PROCEED TO DD
Strategic Fit: 85/100 ████████░░
Financial Profile: 72/100 ███████░░░
Valuation: 80/100 ████████░░
Risk Profile: 68/100 ██████░░░░
Execution: 82/100 ████████░░
Recommendation: PROCEED TO DD
Key Strengths: [top 3]
Key Concerns: [top 3]
Suggested Next Steps: [prioritized actions]
Thresholds
| Score Range | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 80-100 | Strong fit — prioritize for DD |
| 65-79 | Good fit — proceed with caution |
| 50-64 | Marginal — requires strategic justification |
| Below 50 | Poor fit — pass unless compelling thesis |
Deal-Breaker Checks (Auto-Fail)
Before scoring, check for absolute disqualifiers:
- Revenue below buyer's minimum threshold
- Negative EBITDA (unless growth-stage thesis)
- Active material litigation exceeding 20% of EV
- Sanctioned entities in ownership chain
- Industry explicitly excluded by buyer mandate
PE-Specific Criteria
For financial sponsor buyers, additionally evaluate:
- LBO feasibility: Can the deal be levered 3-5x EBITDA?
- Value creation levers: Revenue growth, margin expansion, add-ons, multiple expansion
- Exit path: IPO viability, strategic buyer universe, sponsor-to-sponsor
- Hold period returns: Target 20-25% gross IRR over 3-5 years
- Fund fit: Check size, vintage, sector focus, geographic mandate
Output Format
Metadata
Not sure this is the right skill?
Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.
Find the right skillPaste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.
{
"plugins": {
"official-aniebyl-olo-deal-screening": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_update": true
}
}
}Tags
Related Skills
q-kdb-code-review
AI-powered code review for Q/kdb+ — catch bugs in the most terse language in finance
olo-sec-scanner
SEC EDGAR filing analysis for M&A due diligence — extract financials, detect risks, and track corporate events from 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K filings
trustlog-guard
Financial governance for OpenClaw agents. Tracks API spend, enforces budget limits, detects runaway loops, delivers cost briefings. Reads session .jsonl logs locally. 100% private.
just-fucking-cancel
Find and cancel unwanted subscriptions by analyzing bank transactions. Detects recurring charges, calculates annual waste, and provides cancel URLs. CSV-based analysis with optional Plaid integration for ClawdBot users.
farmos-finance
Query farm financial data — cash flow projections, cost tracking, breakeven analysis. Requires admin authentication. Highly sensitive data.