langgraph-code-review
Reviews LangGraph code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses StateGraph, nodes, edges, checkpointing, or other LangGraph features. Catches common mistakes in state management, graph structure, and async patterns.
Install via CLI (Recommended)
clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/anderskev/langgraph-code-reviewLangGraph Code Review
When reviewing LangGraph code, check for these categories of issues.
Review gates (sequenced)
Complete in order. Each step has an objective pass condition before moving on.
-
Locate graph code — Search the review scope for
StateGraph,compile(,invoke,ainvoke,add_node,add_edge,add_conditional_edges. Pass: a short list of file paths (or explicit “none in scope” after searching). -
Map state schema — For each graph state type (
TypedDict,BaseModel, etc.), list fields that hold lists, dicts, or messages and whetherAnnotated+ reducers (add_messages,operator.add, …) are present. Pass: every such field is either covered by a reducer pattern below or explicitly flagged as intentional overwrite. -
Trace persistence — If interrupts,
thread_id, or checkpoint APIs appear, follow them tocompile(..., checkpointer=...)and invocationconfig. Pass: behavior matches the interrupt/checkpointer/thread_id guidance below—or you document a concrete mismatch with file:line. -
Report with evidence — For each finding you will deliver, record file path and line number(s) (or a minimal quoted snippet). Pass: no critical or high-severity issue is stated without that citation.
-
Run the checklist — Use the checklist at the end of this skill; each item is satisfied, not applicable (with reason), or open with evidence. Pass: no item left silently unchecked.
Critical Issues
1. State Mutation Instead of Return
# BAD - mutates state directly
def my_node(state: State) -> None:
state["messages"].append(new_message) # Mutation!
# GOOD - returns partial update
def my_node(state: State) -> dict:
return {"messages": [new_message]} # Let reducer handle it
2. Missing Reducer for List Fields
# BAD - no reducer, each node overwrites
class State(TypedDict):
messages: list # Will be overwritten, not appended!
# GOOD - reducer appends
class State(TypedDict):
messages: Annotated[list, operator.add]
# Or use add_messages for chat:
messages: Annotated[list, add_messages]
3. Wrong Return Type from Conditional Edge
# BAD - returns invalid node name
def router(state) -> str:
return "nonexistent_node" # Runtime error!
# GOOD - use Literal type hint for safety
def router(state) -> Literal["agent", "tools", "__end__"]:
if condition:
return "agent"
return END # Use constant, not string
4. Missing Checkpointer for Interrupts
# BAD - interrupt without checkpointer
def my_node(state):
answer = interrupt("question") # Will fail!
return {"answer": answer}
graph = builder.compile() # No checkpointer!
# GOOD - checkpointer required for interrupts
graph = builder.compile(checkpointer=InMemorySaver())
5. Forgetting Thread ID with Checkpointer
Metadata
Not sure this is the right skill?
Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.
Find the right skillPaste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.
{
"plugins": {
"official-anderskev-langgraph-code-review": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_update": true
}
}
}Related Skills
tutorial-docs
Tutorial patterns for documentation - learning-oriented guides that teach through guided doing
fetch-pr-feedback
Fetch review comments from a PR and evaluate with receive-feedback skill
swift-testing-code-review
Reviews Swift Testing code for proper use of
rust-testing-code-review
Reviews Rust test code for unit test patterns, integration test structure, async testing, mocking approaches, and property-based testing. Covers Rust 2024 edition changes including async fn in traits for mocks,
explanation-docs
Explanation documentation patterns for understanding-oriented content - conceptual guides that explain why things work the way they do