scientific-thinking-biology
Use when interpreting biological research findings, evaluating life science evidence, analyzing molecular or cellular mechanisms, comparing competing biological hypotheses, designing or critiquing experiments in biology, genetics, genomics, cell biology, immunology, neuroscience, ecology, or any life science domain. Triggers on questions about gene function, pathways, phenotypes, GWAS hits, single-cell data, animal models, clinical translation, evolutionary arguments, or any biology/life science reasoning task.
Install via CLI (Recommended)
clawhub install openclaw/skills/skills/agents365-ai/scientific-thinking-biologyScientific Thinking — Biology & Life Science
A meta-skill for structured, evidence-aware, boundary-conscious scientific reasoning in biology and life science. Biology is complex: phenotypes arise from networks not single genes, model systems don't always translate, and the same data can support multiple mechanistic models. Your role is not just to answer — it is to reason like a careful biologist.
When to Use
- Interpreting experimental results from cell biology, genetics, genomics, immunology, neuroscience, or any life science
- Analyzing molecular mechanisms, signaling pathways, or gene regulatory networks
- Evaluating phenotype–genotype relationships
- Distinguishing marker from driver, association from causation, correlation from mechanism
- Designing, selecting, or critiquing experimental systems (in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, organoids, patient data)
- Evaluating model organism relevance and translatability to humans
- Interpreting omics data (bulk/single-cell RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, proteomics, GWAS, etc.)
- Constructing or evaluating evolutionary, ecological, or physiological arguments
Biological Levels of Organization
Before reasoning, anchor the question to its biological level. Confusion often arises from mixing levels:
| Level | Examples |
|---|---|
| Molecular | protein structure, binding affinity, enzymatic activity, mRNA abundance |
| Cellular | cell state, gene expression program, cell-type identity, metabolism |
| Tissue / Organ | composition, architecture, intercellular communication |
| Organism | phenotype, behavior, physiology, disease manifestation |
| Population / Evolutionary | allele frequency, selection pressure, fitness, adaptation |
| Ecosystem | species interaction, community dynamics |
A finding at one level does not automatically transfer to another level.
Core Reasoning Framework
Work through these layers before responding.
1. Frame the Problem
- What exactly is being asked?
- At which biological level(s): molecular / cellular / tissue / organismal / evolutionary?
- What is known, unknown, and assumed in this biological context?
- Is the question about presence, quantity, timing, location, mechanism, or causal role?
- Restate the real problem if the question conflates levels or mixes concepts.
2. Decompose — Biology-Specific Pitfalls
Proactively check for the most common sources of biological confusion:
Metadata
Not sure this is the right skill?
Describe what you want to build — we'll match you to the best skill from 16,000+ options.
Find the right skillPaste this into your clawhub.json to enable this plugin.
{
"plugins": {
"official-agents365-ai-scientific-thinking-biology": {
"enabled": true,
"auto_update": true
}
}
}Related Skills
semanticscholar-skill
Use when searching academic papers, looking up citations, finding authors, or getting paper recommendations using the Semantic Scholar API. Triggers on queries about research papers, academic search, citation analysis, or literature discovery.
grant-thinking-general
Use when evaluating grant ideas, diagnosing proposal logic, framing fundable projects, strengthening reviewer-aware arguments, or preparing to write any section of a research proposal.
journal-abbrev
Use when looking up journal or magazine name abbreviations, converting between full names and ISO 4/MEDLINE abbreviations, processing BibTeX files for journal name standardization, or answering questions about 期刊缩写/杂志缩写. Triggers on "journal abbreviation", "abbreviate journal", "journal name", "期刊缩写", "杂志缩写", "ISO 4", "LTWA", "BibTeX journal". PROACTIVELY USE when user mentions citation formatting, reference list preparation, or manuscript submission to specific journals.
scholar-deep-research
Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, and PubMed, with deduplication, transparent ranking, citation chasing, self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.
asta-skill
Domain expertise for Ai2 Asta MCP tools (Semantic Scholar corpus). Intent-to-tool routing, safe defaults, workflow patterns, and pitfall warnings for academic paper search, citation traversal, and author discovery.